Annuity Guys®

Annuity Rates, Features & Ratings: America's trusted annuity resource. Compare best options for hybrid, index, fixed, variable & immediate annuity quotes.


Helping You Create Great Results Your Retirement Deserves!


(217)753-1515
You are here: Home / Archives for Life Annuity

Stop Annuity Procrastination: New Years Resolution!

By

Procrastination – or the act of replacing high-priority actions with tasks of lower priority.

We always hear of people who spend more time planning their annual vacations than they spend planning their retirement. An annuity may or may not be one of the strategies you will use to plan a comfortable and secure retirement; do yourself and your family the benefit of resolving to develop a plan for retirement this year.

Watch Dick and Eric in this light-hearted video as they wish you Happy New Years and discuss why we all tend to put off planning for retirement.

[embedit snippet=”video-specialist-button”]

 

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

Read More about Financial New Year Resolutions…

This Year We’re Serious About New Year’s Resolutions

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — Americans make all kinds of New Year’s resolutions.

Losing weight, pledging fidelity to faith and family, and/or improving their career all items that are high on the list of New Year’s resolutions.

But this year, money matters may trump all of those self-directed promises.

So says Fidelity Investments, the Boston-based mutual fund^ giant.

The investment firm uses this time of year to take a look at American’s New Year’s resolutions, and 2013 should bring renewed focus on personal financial matters, with 46% of consumers interviewed by Fidelity promising to improve their financial situation next year.

At first blush, that sentiment might seem like it belongs in the “master of the obvious” category.

But in actuality, the number of Americans targeting financial issues as a resolution is up remarkably over the past few years. In fact, Fidelity says the number of Americans focused on finances come Jan. 1 has grown 31% since 2009. [Read More…]

By Brian O’Connell of The Street

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Dick: Eric and I would like to first of all wish everybody a happy New Year, and we’d like to help you avoid that procrastination aspect of annuities.

Eric: It’s that time that to start setting your New Year’s resolution. It’s what do you need to do to get your financial house in order, perhaps? I think what we see a lot of times, especially right now with the low rate environment, problems in the economy, people are saying, “I’m just going to wait.” I’ve talked to people now that have been waiting for 18, 19, 24 months.

Dick: 23 years waiting for it to get better.

Eric: It’s going to change. I don’t want to know it now because . . .

Dick: How long have they waited in Japan for it to get better?

Eric: They’re going on 20 years right now.

Dick: I don’t think that we’re Japan. I don’t think, folks, that we necessarily have to use that as a true analogy, but the fact of the matter is that we’ve had 4 years or so of . . . we’ve seen the market rebound and do better, but we’re still in really a secular bear market and our economy still hasn’t gotten up to what it was back in the late ‘90s.

Eric: There’s strategies you can use, especially within annuities. If you’re afraid of making a wrong decision, you can at least make a decision with an annuity that has a return-of-premium aspect. If nothing else, a couple years from now, you start over again. There’s things you can do, strategies out there, and pieces that can allow you to move off the couch, so to speak, and get going.

Dick: The goal isn’t just to go out and get an annuity. Eric and I are not proponents of everybody needs an annuity, or everyone needs to make a quick decision. It’s just the opposite. If your situation, your goal, your objective is for the type of things that annuities can help you with, and you’ve been investigating it; what we call in industry, and it’s used a lot, a term is . . . go ahead.

Eric: Analysis paralysis. It’s my favorite term.

Dick: We see it all the time where, for one reason or another, it’s just easier to put it off.

Eric: The fear of making a bad decision puts you in a position where you make no decision. I’m making no decision because if I make a decision, it’s going to be a bad one, so by default.

Dick: By default, many times, you do make a bad decision. Again, when you’re wanting to get into the annuity aspect, you want to make sure you have weighed everything over to a reasonable degree, done your research. Then if it makes sense, the key is Eric, wouldn’t you agree, that if you’re meeting your goals and your objectives you’ve really solved the problem?

Eric: Yeah. That’s exactly . . . we always talk about working backwards. If you know what you want to achieve in the end, it helps you design and put the pieces in place that help you get there. You have to have a target. I always used to quote Zig Ziegler, and he said, “You’ll never hit a target you can’t see.” That’s true of your financial house. As a financial resolution, perhaps this 2013; start thinking about what your targets are. Where do you want to be? When do you want to be there?

Dick: Once you’ve identified the targets, you’ve identified the solution; it’s okay to move forward. You don’t have to keep analyzing and the paralysis of analysis. There is a certain level of becoming comfortable and making a decision. Folks if you’re anything like the clients we work with and most people that we’ve had experiences with, once you’ve made that decision, you’re going to want to second-guess yourself, you’re going to lose a night’s sleep or part of a night, and yet at the same time, you’ll feel a sense of relief that you’ve made the decision.

Eric: Work with a professional. Sometimes when people log into our site, and they say, “I look at all the annuities out there.” There’s almost 3,000 annuities there. How can I chose?

Dick: Just completely overwhelming.

Eric: What we say is, “That’s where you need to work with somebody that’s a professional because they’ll help you narrow down your selections and give you a much more reasonable pool to work within because they know what you are trying to achieve, and they can pinpoint what the best opportunities to help you get there are.”

Dick: Research on the internet of that nature, Eric, is a great place to start. What it really does more than anything, I believe, is it helps you folks to be able to ask the right types of questions to an advisor, to have knowledge of what you’re looking for in a general sense. That way, the advisor can start to narrow down in a much more specific product or antisense of what’s going to actually solve the problem.

Eric: Resolution: Take action, even if the action is making a plan.

Dick: That’s right.

Eric: It’s your retirement. You get to do once, do it right, but don’t let inaction be the plan, because it doesn’t work that way.

Dick: Exactly. Eric, in this video, we haven’t talked a lot about specific annuities. I think it’s good to have a good general discussion like this, where we just kind of share the holdbacks that we see with different individuals that we work with. Also, I just want to add this to it; we see a lot of folks that make a decision, that have done their research, they’re very comfortable with their decision, and they’re very glad they did. Years later, they’re very appreciative of everything that they’ve accomplished.

Eric: It’s the safety security. When you make that decision, sometimes, you feel like you’re giving something up, but you’re not just giving something, up you’re creating the first step in creating a plan.

Dick: Right. Folks, make that New Year’s resolution, not necessarily to run out and buy an annuity, but to go forward and do something that’s very constructive, that’s going to make a difference this year.

Eric: Sounds good. I resolve to see you in 2013.

Dick: Thank you.

What Percentage of Your Portfolio Allocation Should Be Annuities?

By

Want to know just how much of your retirement nest egg you should consider for placement into annuities? The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates that Social Security will cover between 33 and 55 percent of most retirees pre-retirement income. How will you make up the difference?

Eric and Dick tackle the question of how much you should allocate to annuities when developing a sound retirement income and estate plan.

One click on screen to play or pause double click for full screen…

[embedit snippet=”video-specialist-button”]

 

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

GAO Report Tells Americans: Buy More Annuities!

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), a non-partisan federal agency focused on reducing wasteful government spending, has released a report entitled Ensuring Income throughout Retirement Requires Difficult Choices. The two most important choices involve:

  • Delaying the age when you elect to start receiving Social Security payments; and
  • Converting your cash-balance defined benefit pension into a lifetime income annuity rather than take a lump-sum payment upon retirement.
Social Security is Not Enough for Retirement

For those of you that think Social Security will meet your retirement needs, wake up! Given the massive debt overhanging the U.S. economy, the current generous benefits being paid out to retirees is not sustainable. As the GAO report states:

The cost of Social Security benefits is projected to exceed sources of funding, and the program is projected to be unable to pay a portion of scheduled benefits by 2036. In 2010, for the first time since 1983, the Social Security trust funds began paying out more in benefits than they received through payroll tax revenue.

Due to the long-term fiscal challenges facing Social Security, options for reform may result in lower benefits and reduced replacement rates from Social Security. As a result, reforms to the Social Security system may increase the need for retirement income from other sources such as private pensions.

Even under the current generous benefit schedule, social security cannot be relied on to fully replace a person’s pre-retirement salary. According to the GAO report, for low-wage earners (i.e., 45% of national average) social security replaces only 55.2% of pre-retirement income and for high-wage earners (i.e., 160% of national average) the replacement rate is only 33.9%.

by Jim Fink on April 19, 2012 at Investing Daily

 

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Eric: Today we’re going to talk about what percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to annuities, and the magic number is, get right to the point.

Dick: Exactly 50%.

Eric: There you go, thank you very much for.

Dick: Video over. Wouldn’t that be nice?

Eric: Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. Everybody wants the magic answer of what exactly needs to go into an annuity?

Dick: Well, even the GAO which we’re going to talk about here, the Government Office of Accountability did a report last year in June that pretty much hit in July, and actually it’s even on the cover of our book that the GAO is recommending that everyone has more annuities and less securities, so that was the overall assumption that they were making.

Eric: I think it’s looking at the dependence people have on other; when you’re getting to retirement what percentage can you count on Social Security to cover, of your retirement income? The funny thing is you look at low income people in the article we utilized, it’s 55% of low income people, they’re income need is met by Social Security.

Medium wage earners is about a third of their expected income is met by the Social Security income, so how are you then going to supplement; what sources are you going to use to supplement your income and retirement after Social Security? Social Security is not going to do it.

Dick: Right. It won’t cover everything that folks need, so if we take—it’s hard to stereotype, because everybody’s situation is obviously different, but if we take what the GAO report is saying in a summary sense, and say that those folks that are somewhere in that median asset range, where they’re relying more on their Social Security that they would have a tendency to need to put a lot more of their portfolio into a safety and security, that will **guarantee their income throughout their life.

Eric: Right and we talk about this a lot with our clients in talking about the foundational portion of your income, so you take your building blocks. You know you’ve got Social Security, as much as we can count on it to be there. We always like to think of what the COLAs and the things, the increases are going to be.

Dick: Cost of living adjustments.

Eric: Yes, but are we certain that those are going to continue with the way that things are right now? You never know, so if you’ve got Social Security as the base, what do you need to add on top of that each month, to meet your monthly income need? That’s your foundation, a minimum amount, not your trips, not your fancy expenditures, but what’s your basic necessity expenditure need to be? Do we build that with– we always say build it with conservative CDs, annuities.

Dick: If you’re going to do investments, you may have it in bonds.

Eric: Look at the most conservative options out there and utilize those to build that income stream.

Dick: Right and this is where annuities do come in and they work so well, because the one thing that the CDs and the bonds and different things don’t address is longevity and that is outliving our money or another way to say it is, Eric just not dying on time.

Eric: That’s right. When we look at people that utilize CDs, they typically just pull the interest, but if you’re having to utilize the principal to meet those basic necessities that’s really where an annuity comes into play, because it gives you that added layer of insurance that you’re not going to outlive your income.

Dick: Exactly, and so it comes down to the percentage to allocate to an annuity some of this we find, when we’re working with our clients, gets down to that person’s risk aversion. Are they the type of person that’s basically grown their portfolio in a very safe and secure way, and they value annuities for what they do, in terms of safety, security, and controlled growth or are they the type of person that’s been very aggressive with their portfolio, so they’re very comfortable with not having much in safety and security. They may have a very large portfolio, and feel that they’ve got the room to have a very small foundation of safety aspect of corporeal.

Eric: If you’ve got such a large asset base that even if you shock tested it and said, “If we lost half of it and it still is enough to meet your basic income needs.”

Dick: Right, carry us through, throughout our lifetime, right.

Eric: Now for some people when they say, “What’s the percentage?” My answer’s always “The smallest amount that we need to meet that basic need.”

Dick: Exactly, and what we like to do and a lot of the advisers that we’ve worked with, like to do for clients is to look at that objective and figure out what that income need is, and then find the least amount of money that we have to spend to get the proper annuity that meets that need, and that could be Eric, an immediate annuity. It could be a hybrid style annuity.

Eric: Then it’s what options do you want? Immediate may give you a bigger payout, but you’re giving up your asset. A hybrid style may be a little bit less income, but you have a lot more flexibility, as well as some other options with long-term care potentially, or other rider pieces that come into play.

Dick: One thing, folks, that you really always want to keep in mind on anything that you allocate to annuities, especially if you’re allocating for some reason a lion’s share of your portfolio, you always want to keep something available that’s liquid. It should be fairly sizable, because we don’t know what type of emergencies might arise.

Eric: We always talk about inflation, and how are you going to gauge for inflation, and you’re better off to have assets out there that continue to grow, that can continue to work against inflation, especially if you’re set on a level, if you take an immediate income or an immediate annuity and it’s level, how are you going combat increases in expenses?

Dick: That’s one thing, folks where the hybrid style or the fixed index annuity with the income rider works so well. If you can maybe have a portion of your income that, if you need income right away, that you can go ahead and maybe set that up in an immediate annuity or one of your investments or some other area of asset in your portfolio that you can pull money from, while you allow that hybrid annuity to defer over five or ten years. It’s a great inflation hedge to get that income boosted up pretty dramatically.

Eric: I like to call it laddering annuities or laddering and if you haven’t seen that video you can actually look for that afterwards, because there should be one out there. There are strategies to basically, help you as the GAO says here.

Dick: We will put this on the blog site, so that you can see the full report and the article that we’re reading from that addresses Social Security, and again how to maybe, use strategies with annuities for Social Security. Eric, if I ask you the question this week what’s the proper allocation to put in an annuity?

Eric: My answer is the smallest amount that meets your foundational needs.

Dick: I like that. Eric did not say, “Well, it depends.” That’s my famous line, “Well, it depends.” I think you’re right Eric, and I think that it also depends on… Here we go. It also depends on the individual preference for safety and security. We have to always take that into account.

Eric: Yes, it should be suitable for your investment style. Very good; thank you very much for tuning in today.

Dick: Thank you.

Is it Unfair to Compare Annuities to Investments

By

Is comparing annuities to investment choices a mistake? A recent Market Watch article stated that was just one of the three major errors made by both financial professionals and consumers when evaluating annuities.

Eric and Dick examine comparing annuities to investments in this weeks video review.

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

Three annuity mistakes to avoid

What not to do when evaluating annuities for retirement

By Andrea Coombes

If you’re comparing annuities to other investment products, you’re making a classic mistake—and it’s just one of three major errors that consumers and financial experts make when evaluating annuities, according to a panel of experts at a recent MarketWatch Retirement Adviser event in New York that focused on income strategies.

“Both immediate and deferred annuities have been shown to have a very positive role in an overall retirement-income strategy, but the deployment of these instruments is often hampered by some very fundamental misunderstandings,” said John Olsen, president of Olsen Financial Group, and author of a number of books on annuities, including “Index Annuities: A Suitable Approach.”
The panel, moderated by MarketWatch senior columnist Robert Powell, also featured Farrell Dolan, principal with Farrell Dolan Associates, and David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar Investment Management.
Mistake No. 1: Unfair comparisons

One such misunderstanding—and it’s often made by financial experts, Olsen said—is to assess the value of a variable deferred annuity as though all of its costs “are nothing but pure overhead.” That can lead consumers to view such annuities as unreasonably expensive. [Read More…]

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Eric: Today we are going to talk about whether it is unfair or fair to compare annuities to investments.

Dick: Eric, I think that it’s the hardest thing in the world for all of us to stay off of comparing annuities to investments, and I think it is unrealistic to think that we would do any comparison; however, I think that’s where we get in trouble.

Eric: It’s the expectations game. So often when people come to us, they’ve been conditioned to talk about return, whether it be from a mutual fund^, savings account, whatever. Everything’s about return. What’s the return?

Dick: They spent their whole life accumulating this money so their focus has always been on that.

Eric: They are trying to figure out how can I get the biggest return rather than mitigating the risk necessarily with an annuity to get the biggest return in dollars, rather than return in rate.

Dick: What inspired us this week, reading this article by Andrea Combs that really gets into some of the things that we talk about on a regular basis; and that is why do we buy? Why do we choose annuities? There’s contractual **guarantees, there is cash flow, and that is what she really gets into, that there’s this transition that we go through that cash flow becomes king. Longevity of knowing that we’ve got money, no matter how long we live, and there is a third aspect which is maybe a little bit more parallel to investment, that is where you require secure level of growth, contractual **guarantees.

Eric: I like the idea of just saying it transfers the risk from me, as the investor or individual, to the insurance company. They are going to take care of doling out my allowance each month, hopefully, and that’s the income stream that I have confidence in. They’re insuring my future income stream, is how I look at it.

Dick: Past wisdom from the investment world has been that if we draw our portfolio down by a certain level, say 4%, 4½, 3½%, everybody’s got their own view of it, that somehow we can continue to do that and be invested. The last decade has shown us that that really can’t be relied upon.

Eric: In an era of 5% CDs, it’s easy to say, “I can pull of my 5% and never touch my principle.” If you looked today, if you can find a 5% CD . . .

Dick: It’s not there.

Eric: I could sell a few of those, if I could find a 5% CD. That world no longer exists, that safety, security aspect of getting those returns, necessarily. This is where if you need those returns that are a larger withdrawal than just pulling out your principle, and a lot of people do today, this is where annuity comes into play.

Dick: I was just going to say, again, talking about not being focused on the return. Unfortunately so many times folks, annuities are sold based on comparing them to investments, and especially the indexed annuity or the hybrid annuity where it’s stated that you’ve got upside potential to a downside risk; there is truth to that. The upside potential is pretty minimal, and the idea that it has outperformed certain investments, certain indexes, S&P 500 over certain time periods in history, it was ever intended to do that.

Eric: It’s not what they’re geared for. We’ve talked about it in the previous videos, in order for you to be happy, you look at the **guarantees. If you can be happy with what the **guarantees are offered through an annuity, then anything that you get above that . . .

Dick: It’s a pleasant surprise. It’s good news. You’ll never be surprised by an annuity by it going the wrong way. I have to qualify that a little bit. We’re talking more about fixed annuities here and not as much about variable annuity#. Because a variable annuity# is an investment, and yet, it does have some **guarantees.

Eric: It can have some **guarantees.

Dick: It can have, so there is some aspect about that that you have to say, “Maybe for some people, a variable annuity# may fit,” but again that’s a whole different discussion.

Eric: Sure. In her last point, she talks about annuitization, which is a really interesting aspect. We’ve talked a lot about hybrid annuities and the fact that you don’t have to annuitize necessarily, to get the same benefit that you would from annuitization. Her focus is on the stream that’s provided from an annuity.

Dick: For all practical purposes, we’ll just assume that her annuitization would also mean turning on income for life; a different terminology. We do find that with clients that . . . what would I call it, Eric? The depression mentality, where we can live off less so we’re going to, and yet, they’ve set this annuity up so that we can turn it on and turn on this income at a certain point of time and relax, enjoy what we have, and know we will never outlive our money. Yet we have these clients who have a tendency to hold back from that.

Eric: I think nobody wants to give up their principle. You worked hard and earned these dollars, nobody likes the idea of just . . .

Dick: Spending it.

Eric: You give it all to the insurance company and you get that allowance. That’s what really annuitization really is; it protects you on the income side. The income rider on these hybrid annuities does something very similar in a sense: Guaranteed income for life, but still allows you to get access. If anything is leftover, that can go on to your heirs. That’s, I think, the aspect about that type of annuity that’s really popular.

Dick: I think it helps people who wouldn’t normally annuitize to go ahead and take their income stream, because they know that they still have some access to the account value.

Eric: I think it’s really one of the things that we are finding really attractive right now because it does allow that flexibility. For people that are used to this return mentality that we’ve talked about, they still have that opportunity to hold on to those dollars a little bit. Not necessarily get the best return, but to get that income stream, have that safety/security.

Dick: Eric, when we talk about comparing annuities to investments, what’s the balance?

Eric: You have to look at the diversification. For me, when you’re looking at those two things, you have to look at protecting the foundation, and that’s where an annuity comes in. After that, hopefully investments can play a part in controlling for inflation and being out there.

Dick: Maybe a healthy way to compare annuities to investments would be in your own portfolio, in terms of what proportion of your portfolio do you want in security and safety for that income foundation or death benefit-type foundation as compared to what portion are you willing to put at risk?

Eric: Exactly. It’s to protect the foundation. How do you want to protect it? Are you comfortable protecting it in the headwinds that we have going on, or would you rather protect it with a rock-solid foundation?

Dick: I agree. Thank you, folks.

Eric: Thanks for tuning in today.

Do Not Waste Time Considering Annuities, If You…

By

Do not waste your time considering annuities if you cannot find one of the following Annuity Profiles that matches your situation.

Annuity Profiles
1.    Security Oriented – Reached a stage in your life when market risk is not appealing.
2.    Value Freedom from Oversight – Want money to grow securely but do not want to be bothered with constant monitoring. Set it and forget it!
3.    Want a Pension Style Income – Can appreciate a reliable stream.
4.    Like Avoiding Probate for Heirs – Knowing that money can transfer efficiently and IRAs can be stretched over your children’s lifetime.
5.    Your Healthy and Plan to Live a Long Life – Longevity makes annuities work in your favor.

The above scenarios do not have to be an all or nothing strategy. Having specific amounts of money allocated to specific purposes allows for a blending approach when accomplishing retirement objectives.

The above attributes are not as well suited to variable annuities# where securities risk and higher fees are typical.

Dick and Eric discuss the above Annuity Profiles in more detail.

[embedit snippet=”video-specialist-button”]

 

Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified. 

Case Study Example from the Insurance Information Institute:

Is an Annuity Right for You?

Click a Star to rate us as you watch, we love your feedback!!! Click video once for play or to pause.

[starrater tpl=10 style=’oxygen_gif’ size=’24’]

Why should I consider purchasing an annuity?

Annuities can serve many useful purposes.

If you are in a saving-money stage of life, a deferred annuity can:
Help you meet your retirement income goals.
Help you diversify your investment portfolio.
Help you manage your investment portfolio.

If you are in a need-income stage of life, an immediate annuity can:
Help protect you against outliving your assets.
Help protect your assets from creditors.

Read more from the Insurance Information Institute.

Annuity Guys Video Transcript:

Dick: You know annuities really aren’t for everyone and Eric and I…

Eric: Shock! Oh my god.

Dick: Eric and I’d like to kind of tackle that today, and just be maybe a little bit blunt and explanatory, on those that an annuity works well for and those that don’t.

Eric: You’re just saying “Don’t waste time, either yours or ours if…”

Dick: Well, now we don’t mind to waste a little of our time, but it’s their time that they’re concerned about.

Eric: Okay, their time. So if you don’t fit the annuity profiles that we’re going to talk about, probably not best to invest too many more hours pondering, whether or not an annuity fits your situation.

Dick: Right, and many times folks, someone has recommended an annuity to you. Could be an adviser, it could be a friend and it’s really wise to look at your options, and consider what does make sense, what doesn’t make sense, whether it’s an annuity, or an ETF, a mutual fund^, whatever it is that you’re thinking about. However, there are some things about an annuity that make them good for some and not good for others.

Eric: Right, so we always talk about **guarantees safety, **guaranteed growth, , those are some of the things. So if you’re a mutual fund^s stock picker and you like that security as being in the market, you like that aggressive growth profile, an annuity’s probably not.

Dick: Right, an annuity wouldn’t be the right thing. I mean you’re less security-oriented. You’re more willing to take risk. Another thing would be that you would really look at this market, and you would say to yourself that over the next decade or two, that you think things are going to really rock and roll. They’re going to do well. If you’re the type of person that really believes that we’re in for a tough couple of, the next 20 years then you may find yourself thinking that an annuity is pretty appealing.

Eric: Yeah, or if you like to be actively involved.

Dick: Right.

Eric: You know if you’re one of these hands-on, you want to be the trader, you want to have your fingers in everything. I flash back to the Ronco commercials of yore, you know? The little toaster, where it used to say, you know, “You set it and forget it.” If you’re that mentality, then maybe an annuity is kind of an appeal, because it’s one of those things you want that **guarantee, that aspect of the annuity. You want that regular check coming.

Dick: So folks, if you like the idea of freedom from oversight you don’t have to be involved in the day to day activity, the monthly ups and downs of the statement coming in. If that appeals to you then yes, you’re probably going in the right direction.

Eric: Yeah, if you run to the mailbox get that investment statement and go, “Yes,” then that’s probably not an annuity person, you’re more of an investment person.

Dick: Right, exactly.

Eric: So pension-styled income, we talk about you like the idea of getting that check every month. If that appeals to you…

Dick: Well, it’s quite different. There’s nothing else out there, there just literally, is nothing that gives you income **guarantees like an annuity.

Eric: Well, a pension.

Dick: Well, and that is an annuity. I mean Social Security it is a form of an annuity type arrangement. Pensions are annuity type arrangements, and so if you have a lump sum of money, and you want to know that you’re never going to run out of money, never going to run out of income and you value that, then an annuity really is in that line of thinking.

Eric: Right, if you’re more of a person who says, “You know what? I’m just going to take out a fixed. My investments I’ll manage them. I can pull out 3.0-4.0-5.0% every year and I’ll be happy. I don’t need that **guarantee aspect. I’m comfortable with a little.”

Dick: Right, and if inflation goes crazy, and you start getting into your principal that type of thing that you’re comfortable with making those adjustments along the way.

Eric: You can flex up and down.

Dick: Right, right. Again, you’re kind of out of that mode of auto-pilot or set it and forget it. You’re a hands-on, do-it-all.

Eric: Hands-on, right.

Dick: And we have to realize too, this is another issue that I’ve run into with clients and I know you have. Is that as we age, as retirement progresses along we have less and less tolerance or we see our clients have less and less tolerance, for being right on top of things and manipulating it themselves. They really want a lot of times, more of that auto-pilot setup.

Eric: Right, exactly, and I think people start to feel more secure. When you don’t have a salary check coming every month, all of a sudden that regular flow of income that you’re used to getting, if you’ve been in one of those jobs where you got that check every month, then all of a sudden switching to something that’s a little more uncertain.

Dick: Right and you have to make those decisions.

Eric: And they may have been a little bit more aggressive and had tolerance of the market’s ups and downs, at that point in time in their life, but all of a sudden, now they have to get that monthly paycheck. Those ups and downs become a lot more painful.

Dick: It makes a big difference in your ability to sleep well at night and to feel comfortable with what you’re doing.

Eric: Exactly. Speaking of feeling comfortable one of the things, probate comes in. Everybody’s suing everybody these days, but one of the nice things about a lot of states is that annuities are protected, basically from creditors.

Dick: From creditors, that type of thing, and yet even for probate it’s such an efficient way to take money around the probate court, because it goes directly to the heirs, and so that’s good. Also folks, if you have an IRA, that IRA can be stretched, stretched out to your heirs. And insurance companies are one of the few financial institutions that really do that effectively. They are just set up for it. It’s the way they work. So in effect, you can transfer an IRA. Give your children maybe, the equivalent of their own retirement in the future from your IRA, if you don’t need to spend it.

Eric: Exactly. Yeah, and kind of the last profile that I would say that really is key for an annuity, if you think you’re going to have some longevity. You’re going to live a nice long life and you don’t want to have to worry about running out of money, that’s it. That’s the sweet spot right there.

Dick: Right, right. Well, and you know Eric, we’ve always said and we tell people all the time, look we’re not trying to beat the insurance company or beat up on the insurance company.

Eric: Occasionally, I like to beat them, but…

Dick: But if our clients can win. Obviously, we’re always going to err on our client’s side. So if someone has longevity, they really believe that they have the possibility of living that longer life, they really will actually, statistically come out ahead, and win against the actuaries at the insurance company. So then the rate of return isn’t just decent or acceptable or reasonable, it’s very good, and so that’s where we like to have that conversation. There’s also a flip side to this, which I just might want to mention because there’s a few of you folks out there that are just the opposite. You actually believe you’re going to live a much shorter life, and yet you want to know that you can maximize the money that’s coming in to you, never run out and spend all you want while you’re still here. The thing you want to do there is look at an immediate annuity, that’s medically underwritten, because you’ve got some medical condition that you believe will shorten your life, and we can actually do a medically underwritten annuity.

Eric: Right, you may have a condition that basically says, “You know what? Statistically, it takes a couple years off your life expectancy.” Then they rate that based off of that new age that they calculate.

Dick: Right, right. So Eric, is it possible that some people are wasting their time considering annuities?

Eric: Well, most definitely. I mean you always want to look at all your options.

Dick: You do.

Eric: Obviously, the answer is annuities are not for everyone.

Dick: That’s true.

Eric: So hopefully our little five points here, that we’ve got on this page, will help you determine whether an annuity is right for you.

Dick: Exactly. You really have to weigh your situation over and when you go over these points, if a lot of them sound like you, and make sense to you then go forward, do your research, go consider an annuity, and if it’s the opposite?

Eric: Right, if you can’t hit one of the items on the checklist.

Dick: One or two, yeah, just sayonara.

Eric: Thanks for checking us out today.

Dick: Thank you.

How to Get Rid of a Bad Annuity

By

Do you think you made a bad decision on an annuity purchase in the past? Do you think you’re stuck due to surrenders and penalties?  What are your options?

Dick and Eric examine the options that most annuity owners do not know about to possibly move out of an annuity that was misrepresented or one that no longer fits their financial objectives.

[embedit snippet=”video-specialist-button”]

 

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

It should be noted that prior to surrendering or replacing any annuity, careful consideration of all features, penalties and financial goals of the consumer should be evaluated — this is not a decision to be taken lightly.

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Eric: Today we’re going to talk about how to get rid of a bad annuity. Well Dick, is there such thing as a bad annuity?

Dick: Unfortunately, Eric, there are some bad annuities.

Eric: Oh no, don’t tell me that.

Dick: Just like any other investment you can make a bad decision. You can buy a bad annuity. The best way I’ve found, to not have to get rid of a bad annuity, is just not to buy one.

Eric: If you don’t make the mistake upfront, you don’t have to suffer the consequences.

Dick: Right, right, right. So folks do you research, watch our videos, watch other videos. Just read, look at what’s out there, and just use some good judgment.

Eric: Well, that’s a nice summation. Are we done?

Dick: That’s the video.

Eric: Well, I guess we should define when we talk about bad annuities; it’s really a personal situation. It’s you end up with an annuity that doesn’t fit your financial goals or your objectives.

Dick: And it is possible that your financial goals or objectives change, so maybe the annuity wasn’t bad originally.

Eric: It’s just bad now.

Dick: It’s bad now and the other thing that we find happens, not so much recently as over maybe the past few years the annuities, folks, have went through quite an evolution, and we believe have reached kind of a level.

Where they’ve; I won’t say they’ve plateaued, but they’ve come out with these innovative riders, income riders; they’ve become very competitive with each other and we’ve kind of seen what would seem to be a leveling off of what we could expect for any of these annuities.

Eric: Yeah, and the nice thing is its innovation.

Dick: Yes.

Eric: You’ve got companies, there’s competition for your dollars, they want to design the best product that one, creates a need or satisfies a need for you, and those strategies make you money, make the company money, and that’s really what they’re designed for.

Dick: And unfortunately, if you were one of the early ones in, buying the annuities that were available four or five years ago and you compare it to what’s on the market today, with the contractual **guarantees, you may be a little disappointed.

Eric: It’s buyer’s envy I guess, so if I own one that I bought five, six, seven years ago and it’s not meeting my needs…

Dick: Or let’s say it does meet your needs somewhat, but not as good as some of the newer generations.

Eric: All right, so you want to tackle all these? So I’ve got one of these, how do I go about deciding what’s the next step? First of all, can I get out of a bad annuity?

Dick: Well, the answer to that is always it’s your money and it’s your decision.

Eric: And it may depend on your annuity, if you bought an immediate annuity most of the time…

Dick: That’s true, that’s true, yes.

Eric: That’s my one caveat, that if you own the immediate you pretty much…

Dick: You’ve given up your lump sum, so it is your annuity.

Eric: And that’s why we always talk about that being a make sure that’s the right decision, because usually that’s it.

Dick: So if it’s a deferred annuity there could be some extenuating circumstances, first of all. If it was really genuinely a situation, where that annuity was truly misrepresented to you; it was not what you thought you were buying; there could be some aspects of going back to the company, going back to the agent, but again, this has to be fairly well-documented. That it was misrepresented. So in those situations if it was truly not suitable, it was misrepresented, it is possible that the company would allow you to get out of the annuity with no penalty, also the possibility of litigation, that type of thing, or going through the state insurance department if it was misrepresented, but let’s just say that it was not.

Eric: It was just what was available at the time and it’s it sounded good at the time. How many times have we made a decision based off of this sounded like a good decision at the time and it might have been the best available at the time.

Dick: And now interest rates are low. Maybe your interest rates have dropped on the annuity. The cap rates have dropped. You didn’t get one of the income riders that are now available, so you don’t have those contractual **guarantees. Well, one of the things that I think that you want to look at first of all is how close are you to maturity? Will that annuity be maturing, and all of the surrender charges will be gone soon?

Eric: Now and when we talk about maturity and this is always an interesting thing when I talk about it with consumers, because they say “Well, do I lose my income at the end of that contractual, that maturity period?” Really, it’s a surrender time frame typically is what that contract. You can continue past that surrender schedule period. That annuity’s designed to keep going and going and going until…

Dick: Right, they still have contractual **guarantees in place for the client, even though the money is available surrender and penalty free.

Eric: Right, so when we’re talking about maturity in this case we’re talking about when there are no more penalties that will be incurred by basically, surrender charges.

Dick: So if you feel that your annuity is not what you really wanted, you’re only maybe a year or two away from being out of surrender charges, you may want to wait until that couple of year’s passes. You’ll also have some other alternatives. Even if you’re fairly new into the annuity, within a few years or so into the annuity, there’s things that you can look at, which could be an offset to the annuity that you have, and the surrender penalties, if the new annuity that you were looking at has a bonus or a market value adjustment.

Eric: Now and this is where market value adjustments are really kind of an interesting not well kind of…

Dick: Not well understood.

Eric: … understood. Even by some agents. I mean we’ve seen people that have had problems with understanding them and really they work in two ways.

Dick: Yes.

Eric: They can be and basically they work as an offset, for the insurance company in case of the change of rates, so what we’ve seen is they can either be, in addition to the contract at the time of surrender or a subtraction. Now if the interest rates have gone up…

Dick: They’re typically then going to add to your surrender charge.

Eric: Right, and if the rates have gone down, then we’ve seen here in the last few years…

Dick: Then you would have a positive MVA, where your surrender charge is actually reduced by a fairly large amount on the MVA.

Eric: And I know personally we’ve seen this happen. So it actually creates an opportunity for some people at times, when they’ve had an annuity that they’re not real happy with, and if things have gotten you think, surprisingly if they’ve gotten worse, there’s usually sometimes an opportunity to offset that surrender with that MVA, and the MVA is not the Motor Vehicle Association.

Dick: No, it’s not.

Eric: It is a market value adjustment, which is a mouthful.

Dick: And not all annuities have market value adjustment, so you have to look at the type of annuity. When I say the type of annuity, an indexed annuity, a fixed annuity, all of those can have market value adjustments, but not all do.

Eric: Right, so when we’re talking about this in relationship usually, it’s on a fixed or a fixed index and that’s because of what they’re using to reserve. So they’ve purchased bonds and that’s sitting behind it, and so if they have to sell them early that’s the reason usually most insurance companies use them, market value adjustment.

Dick: And the reason, another reason folks, why they have the market value adjustment is the annuities that do not have a market value adjustment on the annuity, typically cannot pay as high a rate or have as many **guarantees, as the one that has a market value adjustment. They have more latitude in terms of getting higher rates or better **guarantees, so that’s a good reason to use an annuity with a market value adjustment.

Eric: Sure. So there is one way to get rid of a bad annuity possibly, even that still has a surrender involved, because you still may have an offset from an MVA.

Dick: Exactly. Another is the new bonus or a bonus from a new annuity. So that if you have a considerable bonus from the new annuity that can help to offset some of the surrender, combine that with an MVA and the advantages of the new annuity if it makes financial sense, then it can be worth doing.

Eric: And that should be qualified. We’re not suggesting you would transfer from one bad product into another bad product.

Dick: Of course.

Eric: It’s got to meet your financial needs and this would only be something we’d recommend, if you’ve got something that’s not working, it doesn’t fit, this is an area where you can explore some options to basically, see if there’s something better out there.

Dick: Right. Unfortunately, it is a possibility that someone, Eric, would get involved in a bad annuity, and so there has to be different ways that someone could go about alleviating that situation.

Eric: Right and one of the things we’re talking about is using, usually a transfer of an annuity. We’re not talking about doing a withdrawal, and then rolling it into another one, though those are all options, but to avoid bigger taxation penalties even, we’ll typically look at transferring from one annuity company to another. So those things will keep you out of taxation penalties.

Dick: Yes, so I think that probably the best way to really avoid a bad annuity in the first place is to buy a good annuity. Do your research. Make certain that it is going to meet your objectives, and then, even if the newer generation annuity does come along, and does have a few additional advantages, if the original annuity that you set up met your retirement objectives, then there should still be some merit there and some good basis for why that was chosen.

Eric: Exactly, and you don’t want to just throw something. You don’t want to throw the baby out with the bath water I guess is the saying, and so make sure you’re not making just a rash decision to get something else.

Dick: That’s right.

Eric: And that’s why these annuities do have surrender charges, they do have these pieces, because they are designed to be long term, lifetime income generating products.

Dick: Make you think twice about messing up your retirement by ending your IRA or your annuity and that’s why these penalties are there.

Eric: Right, so as we say, you usually only get to do retirement once, so do it right.

Dick: That’s right. There are no do-overs in retirement. Thank you.

Eric: Thank you.

Annuities – The Best Financial Product No One Wants!

By

Why would an insurance actuary call annuities the best financial product no one really wants? And why would he go on to say that in retirement he might not even purchase an annuity himself even when he knows they make good sense?

Dick and Eric discuss why individuals purchase annuities – even though they don’t want to…

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

Annuities: The best financial product no one really wants

“Annuities are not sexy. You hand over your money to an insurance company who then puts you on a seemingly stingy allowance for the rest of your life”

People who save through RRSPs have a choice to make when they retire. They can transfer their RRSP balance to an RRIF and draw it down at their own pace (subject to a minimum) or they can buy an annuity.

The simple fact is, an annuity may be a great idea, but hardly anyone buys one.

It is easy to blame low interest rates, which depress the amount of annuity income one can buy these days. But annuities were not in vogue even when interest rates were much higher a dozen years ago.
‘Let me be honest. When I retire, I am unlikely to buy an annuity myself, even though I’m an actuary and know all the advantages’

Economists have come to refer to this phenomenon as the “under-annuitization puzzle.”

Buying an annuity seems like an elegant solution since it removes the risk of outliving one’s assets (what actuaries like to call “longevity risk”), it eliminates the hassle of making investing decisions after retiring and the income stream it provides is super safe (it really is, at least in Canada). So why are they so unpopular?

In recent years, however, the economics of annuities have improved greatly. Annuities in Canada now generally return 95% to 100% of premiums paid. In fact, with the recent fall in long-term government bond yields, annuities now return more than 100% return of premiums paid in many cases. The economics, then, can no longer be blamed.

Another often-cited reason for not annuitizing is that the retiree wants to leave a large lump sum to a survivor in the case of early death. This argument, however, does not hold up on closer examination.
Advertisement

Even when people have little or no interest in leaving assets behind for their heirs, they tend not buy annuities. Moreover, annuities can come with generous survivor income options, if one is prepared to pay for them. Another excuse shot down.

There are other explanations for this puzzle, including: The desire to have money on hand in retirement for a rainy day; the recognition that income needs might vary and the fixed income from an annuity might not match up well; and a reluctance to give up the chance to do better by investing in equities within a RRIF if stock markets do well.

Let me be honest. When I retire, I am unlikely to buy an annuity myself, even though I’m an actuary and know all the advantages.

I would be the first to admit this reaction is not entirely rational. The reason, plain and simple, is that annuities are not sexy. You hand over your money to an insurance company who then puts you on a seemingly stingy allowance for the rest of your life. [Read the Full Article from Fred Vettese at the Financial Post]

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Eric: The topic is annuities. The best financial product no one really wants.

Dick: Can you imagine that no one would want an annuity, Eric? Is that a true statement?

Eric: No, the people I talk to every day, everybody wants an annuity.

Dick: But that’s different. Folks, the people that we talk to may be someone like yourself that’s actually went to our national website, as Eric likes to remind me, international website.

Eric: International website.

Dick: But goes to our website and they’re already in the mindset of annuities.

Eric: Right, they’re doing their research. They’re doing the background on why this might work for them.

Dick: So we might be just a little bit skewed, do you think?

Eric: We’re taking it based off an article, and interestingly enough, it was written by an actuary who works for an insurance company. His comment and I love this, “Annuities are not sexy. You hand over your money to an insurance company who then puts you on a seemingly stingy allowance for the rest of your life.” Well, that sounds pretty pathetic, if you ask me.

Dick: I do have to say that, before I knew much about annuities, many years ago that never entered my mind, never crossed my train of thought. Would I rather have a new car, a new house, or an annuity?

Eric: Rather than an annuity. That’s not fair. Everybody would rather have a new car or a new house.

Dick: That’s right, and really when you think about it, and that’s a lot what this article gets into is we built this money up. We accumulate this money and we like the idea of hanging onto it, controlling it, investing it, whatever we choose to do with our money, but to hand it over to an insurance company and let them give us money back, it’s kind of a transitional state that we go through to make these types of decisions, and there has to be a pretty good reason behind it.

Eric: I come from a family of educators. I’ve talked about that before.

Eric: You know right now in Illinois, we’re fighting. They’re fighting to maintain their pension. Well, what’s an annuity really?

Dick: It’s a pension-style income.

Eric: I mean for today’s 401k investors they’re basically, when you get your retirement you’ve got this lump sum. Do you want to keep the lump sum or would you rather have a pension?

Dick: The vast majority of retirees before they retire and they have this choice, not all companies give this choice; but there are a lot of corporations that will give the employee the choice of a lump sum or a pension. Now the vast majority choose the pension. They’ve worked their entire life.

Eric: For the seemingly stingy income for life?

Dick: Yeah, and yet, even those that would take the lump sum, in many cases will turn right around with that lump sum, and buy a commercial annuity that they feel is a better option, than maybe the pension the company was going to offer. So we tend to get it when it comes to that lump sum that comes from the employer, but yet many times we’ve worked all of our lives, built up all of this money and what’s the purpose of it?

Eric: It’s mine. I want to keep it.

Dick: What’s it supposed to accomplish?

Eric: That’s exactly it. It’s just future spending. It’s not savings. Its future spending is what we’ve save for, but we don’t think of it in those terms. We think of it as “This is money I saved. I don’t want to give it to somebody and then have them, give me a seemingly small allowance.”

Dick: Right, and that’s where the insurance company’s job, their job is to look at risk, to manage risk, to know what’s realistic. You’ll have to read this report, folks and kind of get the gist of what this person’s saying, because he actually is an actuary and he’s really laying out that these insurance companies don’t always win on this stuff.

Eric: And he talked about annuities are much better—the design and what they payout in today’s era, is much better than they were 10-20-30-years ago.

Dick: Right, a lot’s changed.

Eric: You really do have an actuarial advantage to buying an annuity and he admits that, even though I know this advantage exists, I’m not so sure.

Dick: I might be standoffish when I first retire, but maybe as my age advances I’m going to be more apt to do this. This kind of brings me back to a lot of the buzz that is out there and things we talk about with the hybrid annuity but one of the things that appeals so much to folks, on a hybrid-style annuity is that they are able to control that lump sum. What we call majority control the first 10-years or so of an annuity. You have some surrender charges, so you control about 90% of it during that first 10 years, and those surrender charges decline, so after 10 years, you control 100% of it and you still have a lifetime income. And yet, if you haven’t used that money in your account, it can all go on to your heirs, your spouse, whatever is important to you.

Eric: Exactly. In his life point, I guess in summation here he talks about you know what? Everybody has, even if you have that lump sum investment you have, usually a portion that’s in equities and you have a portion as you get closer to retirement that we should all be moving into those fixed payments, bonds, CD-style. What would be wrong with taking those more conservative assets, turning that into an annuity and then just truly letting your equities run, and knowing you have that **guarantee that income coming on?

Dick: Well, Eric obviously this is what we talk to our clients about. We talk to them about balanced allocation. Not putting everything into annuities, not necessarily having everything in the market. Finding that balance that works for each individual, and so to me, he’s right along the lines of what we continue to explain to people.

Eric: Exactly, yes. He takes care of the foundation very well.

Dick: So Eric, would you say that an annuity is something that no one wants?

Eric: All right, there are a few people that want annuities.

Dick: Well, folks we’re not saying that an annuity is going to be the end-all and the be-all or exactly what you need, but you do want to look at it closely and determine where it might fit into your overall financial picture. We really appreciate you spending the time with us, today.

Eric: You have a great afternoon.

 

 

 

Why You Should Ladder Annuities…

By

When your financial advisor starts to talk to you about laddering, realize that they are talking to you about using financial products with varying maturities and that they are most likely not thinking about a trip to the hardware store.

In today’s low interest rate environment laddering annuities allows clients to potentially capitalize on increasing rates without forgoing returns that can only be obtained by committing to a longer maturity period. Laddering provides an opportunity for conversion of shorter maturity annuities to better options if they are available earlier – then the maturities continue to provide that option on a regular ongoing basis.

Perhaps the best option to ladder annuities is by staggering deferred hybrid annuities for future income. By laddering hybrid annuities you can create a income stream that will combat inflation and provide for added flexibility with future income.  It can also be an excellent strategy for financial security should you live a longer then expected life.

Eric and Dick break down some of the pros and cons for laddering annuities.

[embedit snippet=”video-specialist-button”]

 

Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

See how Scott Bulmer and  Kevin Hedstrom address this same topic in a recent issue of Life Health Pro.

Customize Annuity Options With Laddering

As an agent who has worked with hundreds of clients to help them build and protect their retirement nest eggs, I am now faced with helping my clients make the dramatic shift from the wealth management phase (gathering and growing assets) to the income management phase (preserving and distributing assets). With 78 million baby boomers racing toward—or already in—retirement, the need for retirement income protection has never been greater.

It’s been well documented that since Jan 1, 2011, about 10,000 baby boomers have and will continue to turn 65 each day. This demographic phenomenon forces our industry to be the catalyst in moving clients’ mindset from accumulation to income distribution strategies. Our retiree clients now need to draw down their assets to generate a reliable, secure income stream that will allow them to maintain the lifestyle they so desire during their retirement years.

With the latest gyrations in the stock market, historically low interest rates and the economic turmoil here and abroad still fresh in their minds; clients are looking for less risky solutions to creating a secure retirement income combined with growth potential. Those clients nearing or in retirement can’t afford to weather another pullback in the market as was experienced several years ago. They just don’t have the time horizon or risk tolerance to recover unless they want to continue working throughout their retirement. In addition to market shifts, we are dealing with traditional safe money alternatives, such as CDs, money market funds and saving accounts, that may be out of favor due to these low rates.

Fixed indexed annuities as a solution

All of these forces—demographic and economic—pose an interesting challenge to agents. The major risks facing senior clients today are:

  • Market risk—The ongoing volatility in the stock market
  • Inflation risk—The erosion of one’s purchasing power
  • Longevity risk—The increase in life expectancy

The average individual’s lifespan has increased markedly over the last 50 years, and people now have to worry about running out of money before they run out of time.

A product solution to mitigate these risks that I’ve incorporated in my practice is the fixed indexed annuity. Since their introduction in 1995, indexed annuities have given people the opportunity to participate in the upside of being linked to an index, such as the S&P 500, without having to worry about losing money. Clients are very receptive to the dual nature of this product, which, at its core, is an insurance contract. They get the opportunity to partake in the upside potential of the stock market, with the **guarantee they won’t lose money. In addition, over the years, these products have performed as they were designed to. [Read More…]

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Dick: One of the things that Eric and I find ourselves involved in a lot of times with annuities is laddering those annuities.

Eric: Right. It’s a technique or a strategy that we employ that uses multiple annuities with basically different maturity dates. So you would start with perhaps a three-year or a five-year or a ten-year, different layers.

Dick: I think a lot of folks, Eric, are familiar with CDs. You’re familiar with CD laddering. You may not have called it laddering, but staging your CDs over a period of time.

Eric: Staging or staggering.

Dick: It works very well for annuities for different reasons.

Eric: Right. Well, what are some of those reasons? Safety because you could use three different companies.

Dick: Diversification helps with that safety.

Eric: Right. Then you’ve also got return.

Dick: If you’re wanting to grow your money. We’re in a very low interest rate environment. So what do we think is going to happen maybe over the next three to six to eight years?

Eric: We expect interest rates to rise because they’re at all-time lows. They’re almost at zero in the case of the Fed rate.

Dick: Sure.

Eric: So we expect to see growth. But what do you do now? In order to get the biggest return right now, you have to commit to seven, eight, nine, or ten years.

Dick: It’s a pretty long period of time. Right.

Eric: Is it a smart decision to say, “I want to put all my money in a ten year product right now,” knowing that rates are likely to go up in say three or four years?

Dick: It probably isn’t if you’re looking for growth.

Eric: Right. But are you willing to sacrifice three years of growth just waiting?

Dick: Well, the alternative to that though, Eric, is if we don’t do anything, we get no return at all.

Eric: Well, actually we lose money.

Dick: We lose money because of inflation.

Eric: Inflation.

Dick: Exactly.

Eric: Yeah, exactly. By looking at, in the case of return, staggering those things. Monies are coming due at various intervals. It gives you that.  The one thing I like to use annuities for in laddering is the income riders and the income **guarantees.

Dick: Right, which is a completely different way of looking at annuities and using them, but it’s been very effective for our clients.

Eric: The strength of an annuity right now, especially the hybrid annuities, is the **guarantees for income and deferral. You still have the five, six, or seven percent out there that you can get in a deferred for income. If you use a stage one annuity, perhaps turn income on right away knowing that you’ve got this **guarantee in deferral, your stage two or the second rung of the ladder you can turn on.

Dick: This helps us to offset inflation, because we know that, initially, we can start off with an income that would be adequate for that time period, but that we’re going to need to supplement that income five years, eight years, or ten years down the line. The next annuity kicks in at that stage, which is laddered.

Eric: Exactly. The it’s even nice to have an optional rung that may sit out there that you may never even anticipate turning it on. But if you have longevity that you don’t either anticipate or something happens, you’ve got that third one out there that’s in deferral getting those **guarantees. So it becomes that additional rung.

Dick: Right. It can pass on to the heirs, or you can turn it on if you need it. One of the things that we really don’t know right now is what is going to happen to certain pensions, what cutbacks or things might happen with Social Security. So it’s nice to have that contingency, that annuity out there that’s going long term.

Eric: Right, and it’s nice to have one that’s especially geared for growth. You know that it’s going to be at this level here, this level here, and this level here. The **guarantees, having those **guarantees out there.

Dick: When would it maybe not make sense to ladder?

Eric: Not use a ladder? Well, obviously if you have limited assets. There are just times when there are minimum deposit requirements, and if you have limited assets, you may only have an option of one annuity. That’s one.

Dick: Sure. When we say “limited assets,” maybe $100,000 or $200,000, somewhere in that neighborhood? I guess it depends on the income that you need. It depends on the growth that you need.

Eric: Right, it depends on all that.

Dick: I do know that the more money that you have, folks, especially when you start getting up there in the $400,000 to a million or a million plus, it makes a lot of sense to ladder and diversify as compared to maybe below $400,000. There can be some good reasons to still ladder and still diversify, but you have to look at it a little closer.

Eric: Right. One of the things we run into a lot is much of the time you’ll see one specific annuity that performs best for somebody’s situation, and there’s just not another comparable piece that does the same thing.

Dick: So the tradeoff is to get the diversification, the safety, and the laddering that maybe you’re looking for, you have to take considerably less in benefits.

Eric: It’s simply deciding to take a pay cut. If you value the other things you get in the willingness to take a pay cut, that’s what that balance is.

Dick: Then there are, again, some annuities out there, on the growth stage where it’s not just income or the pay cut, where they give a really nice death benefit. On top of that death benefit, they will give a nice return, so that you would maybe have the potential to see somewhere between a 6% to a 10% return from a very safe position with your assets. It may be a situation where a person would say, “Hey, because I want this to go onto my heirs, I don’t really need to ladder it,” depending on the amount of money.

Eric: It’s the **guarantees. You are getting a contractual **guarantee in this case from an annuity that is superior to something else that’s offered by anybody.  It’s if you’re willing to take less and go here and split them, that’s an option. If you know your best circumstances lays right here, sometimes you’ll decide not to ladder.

Dick: I would say, just for folks as we kind of wind things up here, that in most cases the laddering is a good thing, works, and should be looked at. Occasionally, though, it’s not. I mean occasionally you’re going to want to go with one company that gives you the greatest benefit, and it isn’t going to make as much sense to ladder.

Eric: The best way to say this is, “You know what? Sit down with someone who can run the numbers for you, talk to them about what the pros and the cons are, and then ultimately you get to make the decision.” Now, I think it should always be one of the things that’s part of the consideration and part of the discussion. For most advisors, that’s exactly how they’ll present it: Here’s option one, here’s option one and two, and here’s how that works out.

Dick: Right. What are you comfortable with?

Eric: Exactly. Where is your comfort level? You’re in control.

Dick: Right. Pick what’s best for you.

Eric: Exactly. Thanks for checking us out.

Dick: Thank you.

 

Never Place an IRA in an Annuity? Wrong!

By

One question that seems to come up on a regular basis is “should I use my IRA/401k dollars to purchase an annuity?” As financial advisors and planners we have to take a “big picture view” prior to answering, because it really depends.

What benefits or options are you seeking to get from your annuity that you could not get from an IRA placed in another financial vehicle?

Many CPAs have a blanket answer when questioned about IRA dollars being used in annuities –  it goes some thing like this “No. Your IRA already has tax deferral so their is no advantage to obtaining an annuity with your IRA dollars.” That answer for many retirees is incomplete at best! What about safe asset growth, income **guarantees, or income for life – not to mention a potential IRA “tax trap”?

For more insights into the IRA/Annuity question check out this short video.

[embedit snippet=”video-specialist-button”]

 

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

This is a question that has been debated many times… check out this MarketWatch article by Robert Powell from 2005 for more insights into this discussion.

Do annuities belong in an IRA?

BOSTON (MarketWatch) — It is, without fail, one of the all-time great debates in the financial-services industry. Do annuities — variable, fixed or index — belong in an IRA? The answer, unfortunately, depends on who you ask.

Firms that manufacture and distribute such products, not surprisingly, say yes. And consumer advocates, also not surprisingly, say no, citing among other things a suit filed last week alleging that a major insurer improperly sold variable annuities# for use within an IRA.

Consumer advocates and industry experts point out it’s unwise to invest solely in a tax-deferred product, an annuity, inside an IRA which also offers tax-deferral. “Since money invested in an annuity grows on a tax-deferred basis, I’m not a big fan of using them in IRAs,” says Ken Little, author of “The Idiot’s Guide to Annuities.”

Others, including the National Association of Securities Dealers, agree. Don’t invest in a variable annuity# inside an IRA solely for its tax-deferral is the upshot of one notice the NASD sent to brokerage firms it oversees. And insurers don’t dispute that advice. Heather Dzielak, vice president of Lincoln Financial Group’s annuity business, says this: “If (a person’s) primary goal is tax deferral, variable annuities# within IRAs offer no additional tax advantage over the IRAs inherent tax deferral feature.”

But Little, the NASD and others do leave the door open for investors to put their money into such products for other reasons, especially if they understand the costs associated with the benefits they are buying.

For instance, some experts say investors who want, in addition to tax-deferral, certain **guarantees — **guaranteed interest rates, a death benefit, or what insurers call living benefits (**guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits, **guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, and **guaranteed minimum income benefits) — and don’t mind paying, in some cases, about 2 percentage points for those **guarantees might consider using an annuity in an IRA.

[Read More…]

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Dick: Eric, frequently, we see articles from the investment industry, from CPAs, just financial magazines, and they talk about an IRA not belonging in an annuity.

Eric: That’s good. We’ve had clients, even the last couple of months here, they’re retiring. They’ve got 401Ks. They have these qualified buckets. It’s time to start spending these dollars. That’s their savings for retirement.

Dick: All these years, they’ve put this money away for their retirement to produce an income.

Eric: They’re starting to think about spending down their 401Ks or their IRAs.

Dick: What do their CPAs tell them?

Eric: “You’ve already got tax deferral in an IRA and 401K.”

Dick: Why would you want an annuity with tax deferral? That is the standard argument that’s used. What’s wrong with that argument?

Eric: You mean you can’t have double tax deferral?

Dick: Why would you need double tax deferral?

Eric: You can’t get that.

Dick: You don’t need an annuity. Is that why people buy an annuity? Is that why people use that for a portion of their portfolio? For tax deferral?

Eric: No. That’s what we always say. There’s no universal answer, but when it comes to tax deferral, do you need a double tax deferral? No. What are the other benefits that they really offer to you?

Dick: The reasons why, right.

Eric: You have IRA dollars; you’re saving for retirement. You’re now going to start to spend your retirement. What does an annuity do for you?

Dick: Safety, security, income **guarantees. In a down economy, in a volatile economy, it’s a sense of knowing where you’re going to be today or 5 or 10 years from now.

Eric: Just because I have an IRA it doesn’t mean I automatically get income for life?

Dick: No, you do not.

Eric: But I have tax deferral.

Dick: Unless everything works out perfect or you have an annuity. In no way do we advocate with our clients or to those who listen to our videos that you put all of your money into an annuity.

Eric: No. When we hear CPAs automatically discount an annuity for IRA dollars or qualified dollars, we have to pull our hair out and see we’ve been doing this a lot lately, because it can be poor advice in a universal sense. You can’t just universally say, “No, you should never put IRA dollars or qualified dollars into an annuity.”

Dick: It makes more sense when you’re younger to think that way, when you’re in that accumulation portion of your life, where you’re growing your dollars. It wouldn’t make a lot of sense to buy an annuity when you can have your money invested where it can potentially earn more and grow. No, that portion, but what happens is that same argument that’s used during those years doesn’t get carried over into the retirement years. It actually gets carried over instead of that transition where things change. Let me ask you a question here to get off the subject a little bit; where are taxes going?

Eric: Taxes?

Dick: Are taxes going down or up?

Eric: Let’s see here. If I had to be a betting man, I don’t think Vegas would give me good odds on this, but I would guess they’re going up.

Dick: I think you might be right. I think most of the folks that are watching this will agree with us. If taxes are going up, then what do I have if I have a pile of money I’ve never paid tax on?

Eric: You got a good deal, because you never pay tax on it.

Dick: What’s going to happen to it?

Eric: Is the government going to make me take these dollars and pay taxes?

Dick: Do you think maybe I have a trap here that I’m caught in, a tax trap? That’s what I see an IRA is, it’s very much a tax trap because we are likely to see increasing taxes as time goes by. Wouldn’t it make more sense to systematically be removing some money from that IRA, using it for the intended purposes of creating income and getting some money out of there so that it’s not all taxes in one large amount?

Eric: That sounds logical, but what would your CPA say? I’m making fun of CPAs right now.

Dick: What do CPAs do? In reality, when you think about it, they’re very, very good at saving us money on taxes in the year we’re going to file our return, or looking forward to the next year. Looking at the 20 or 30 years, a lot time . . . Folks, if you have one of those CPAs that looks 20 years down the line and projects things out for you, and look at ways to save you money, you have one of the rarest CPAs out there; they’re in the top 1% or 2%. Nothing against CPAs, they do a great job; they keep us legal, they save us money on taxes, but a lot of times, they’re looking at what can we save today. They’d rather defer some dollars from tax, not really thinking in terms of what’s happening with potential tax rates 10 or 20 years from now and getting that money out.

Eric: From a CPA’s standpoint, they’re thinking about tax now. Yes, if the answer is there a difference between a tax-deferred scenario between the IRA and the annuity? Of course not. If you’re saying, “What about the other benefits” Then, yes, that’s where the annuity, using qualified dollars makes perfectly good sense.

Dick: It does. When we say, “Never move IRA money into an annuity. Never buy an annuity with IRA money . . .”

Eric: Wrong.

Dick: Not.

Eric: Wrong. Take your personal situation and apply it. Basically, no, there are times when it does make sense.

Dick: There are. But everybody’s situation is different. They need to get a good advisor for that, a good local advisor. Thank you.

Eric: Have a good day.

 

Is Social Security an Annuity?

By

It is important to understand the way that Social Security was designed to function. By commercial standards, this is the ultimate lifetime annuity. The definition of an annuity is basically exchanging one’s money with some entity in return for a reliable income stream over a period of time based on a predetermined agreement. The strength of the annuity in this case is the full backing of the US government which is considered to be the safest financial haven of the entire world. With this, Social Security’s ultimate annuity aspects are:

  • Full Backing of the US Government
  • Tax advantaged – 0 to 85 percent is taxed based on income
  • Inflation Protection – cost of living increases (COLAS)
  • Income for life – eliminating longevity risk
  • Spousal, Family and Survivor benefits
  • Priced less than commercially available annuities

 

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

What did retirees do before 1935 when Social Security was not available? What about those less fortunate who had no supplement for their retirement income to survive? There was more family and church involvement on behalf of the poor and more hardship for certain. Here are some recent statistics from www.SSA.gov that demonstrate why Social Security, like it or not, is likely to be continued to a large degree as part of what it means to be a Social Security entitled US citizen.

  • In 2011, nearly 55 million Americans will receive $727 billion in Social Security benefits.
  • Social Security is the major source of income for most of the elderly.
  • Nine out of ten individuals age 65 and older receive Social Security benefits.
  • Social Security benefits represent about 41% of the income of the elderly.
  • Among elderly Social Security beneficiaries, 54% of married couples and 73% of unmarried persons receive 50% or more of their income from Social Security.
  • Among elderly Social Security beneficiaries, 22% of married couples and about 43% of unmarried persons rely on Social Security for 90% or more of their income.
  • Social Security provides more than just retirement benefits.
  • Retired workers and their dependents account for 69% of total benefits paid.
  • Disabled workers and their dependents account for 19% of total benefits paid.
  • About 91 percent of workers age 21-64 in covered employment in 2010 and their families have protection in the event of a long-term disability.
  • Just over 1 in 4 of today’s 20 year olds will become disabled before reaching age 67.
  • 67% of the private sector workforce has no long-term disability insurance.
  • Survivors of deceased workers account for about 12% of total benefits paid.
  • About one in eight of today’s 20 year olds will die before reaching age 67.
  • About 97% of persons aged 20-49 who worked in covered employment in 2010 have survivors insurance protection for their young children and the surviving spouse caring for the children.
  • An estimated 158 million workers, 94% of all workers, are covered under Social Security.
  • 50% of the workforce has no private pension coverage.
  • 31% of the workforce has no savings set aside specifically for retirement.
  • In 1940, the life expectancy of a 65-year-old was almost 14 years; today it’s almost 20 years.
  • By 2036, there will be almost twice as many older Americans as today — from 41.9 million today to 78.1 million.
  • There are currently 2.9 workers for each Social Security beneficiary. By 2036, there will be 2.1 workers for each beneficiary.

Low Interest Rates Hurt Seniors

By

The Federal Reserve Board has not formally relaxed its intention to keep interest rates low through the end of 2014. And there is little new to say about the way non-existent interest rates on savings accounts, certificates of deposit, and U.S. Treasury securities have hurt all savers, particularly risk-averse investors.

Retirees are, of course, the poster children for risk-adverse investments, and their nest eggs have been hammered by the Fed’s policy. The Fed has said that low rates help the economic recovery. So it argues, in effect, that investors should enjoy the solid stock market returns and that savers should display a stiff upper lip. [Read More at US News…]

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

4 Ways New Annuity Rules Will Help Retirees

The White House last week strongly endorsed annuities as a needed but missing piece of Americans’ retirement plans. Insurance companies and annuity trade groups had something nice to say about Washington regulators for a change. And the new rules just might set in motion some interesting retirement-plan changes.

Among financial products, annuities have long been a very hard sell. It’s easy to understand the appeal of buying Apple stock or getting in on the ground floor of Facebook’s IPO. Understanding annuities and their benefits, however, is not on the minds of many investors.

The premise of an annuity is easy to state: Give some money to an insurance company and it will make **guaranteed payments to you for the rest of your life. The money can be paid now or in the future. The payments can begin at any time the investor chooses. And the lifetime stream of income promised by an annuity can augment Social Security and help put to rest a person’s fear that he or she will run out of money before they die.

[Read More at US News…]

Annuity Guys® Video Transcript:

Dick: One thing that really gets our blood boiling, and I would have to say a lot of the folks that we speak with, is this low interest rate environment that is really being penalizing to retirees.

Eric: The unfortunate thing is you’ve got a government who is forcing low interest rates down our throat.

Dick: Why would that be to our government’s benefit, Eric?

Eric: Let’s see here. If I print cheap money, and if I don’t have to pay it back at high interest rates . . .

Dick: If I owe $16 trillion, and there’s a way I can actually manipulate and hold interest rates low, that might be a good thing for me?

Eric: Just borrowing free money. We’ve been propping up the banks and propping up and, supposedly, economy by keeping these rates low, but the return effect is we’ve taken our retirees and our savers, and we’ve thrown them under the bus.

Dick: We’ve penalized them in a major way. When you look at the financial institutions that these interest rates were put into effect, supposedly, to help and to shore-up, these financial institutions are all passing their stress tests.

Eric: They’re making money.

Dick: They’re making money; they’re coming back. There’s a few that are having a challenge, but overall, our financial system at least gives the appearance that it’s been restored to some degree.

Eric: What they did is they designed this to basically push money into the economy to make it better to borrow. Borrowing helps the economy; that’s what the theory is here.

Dick: Stimulating the economy.

Eric: If you want to borrow money right now, it’s a great time, but if you’re getting close to retirement and you’ve already saved up everything, you’re now earning next to nothing on most of your major options or your safe money options: Your CDs, your money markets, the FDIC-insured options. You’re being forced to look at other alternatives.

Dick: Our corporations are cash-rich. The banks have a lot of cash that they don’t know what to do with. The demand isn’t there to borrow the money, even though the rates are extremely low. What I believe that this is leading up to, and I think, Eric, we’ve discussed this, is that there is no short-term fix.

Eric: No. In fact, Uncle Ben Bernanke has promised us that we’re going to keep interest rates at this level at least until the beginning of 2015. We’re sitting here, years away now, and people are saying, “Are rates ever going to increase?” The crystal ball in front of us says no, because we’ve got a **guarantee, or a pledge, to keep rates at a hyper-low level.

Dick: Our government’s motivation isn’t there to stimulate and raise the rates for savings, which encourages savings and that type of thing. The more that consumers spend, the more that they borrow, the more that drives the economy, and it has that other side effect of holding the government’s borrowing costs down. When we look at Japan, we go back to 20 years of very, very low interest rate environment, and the savers over there have had . . . who knows if we’re really following that model or not, but there are some similarities there.

Eric: I’ll be honest, and Dick’s heard me say, I don’t care about Japan. I’m worried about what happens here at home.

Dick: What happens to our clients right here in Central Illinois, United States.

Eric: That’s right. We’ve got people that are constantly walking in the door. I’ve had umpteen people that are typical CD borrowers, who walk in with their hands in the air, and they go, “What can I do? What are the alternatives?”

Dick: We’ve been pretty fortunate. We’ve been able to establish at least the foundational portion of many of our clients’ portfolios in annuities, and we’ve been able to ladder those annuities and get 8% **guaranteed growth on the income base anyway. Maybe the cash accumulation isn’t growing at 8%, but their income base is growing, that they can draw their income off of. It will have a tendency to outpace or stay ahead of inflation.

Eric: Just real quickly, when we talk about laddering annuities, what we’re talking about is basically having different start-points for annuities. You may turn on Year-1 and you may wait 5 years before you turn on another, and another 10 years before you would turn on a third.

Dick: You’ve got this 8% or 7% compounding year-after-year. The longer you can stretch it out, the better. You may need some income immediately or income in 5 years, and then income in 10, in 15.

Eric: To turn those on after those have been in deferral so they have a greater compounding effect.

Dick: The other choice that we have if somebody needs income right away, is to setup some type of an immediate annuity or a hybrid annuity that will actually have some cost of living adjustment built into it.

Eric: The one thing with [inaudible: 05:11] the immediate annuities, if you start them with a cost of living adjustment, they usually start a little bit lower than those that just have a normal life expectancy.

Dick: Similarly on some of the hybrids, but there are some hybrids that will actually start about the same point and still have a cost of living adjustment built into them.

Eric: That’s what we always talk about with the client: What’s the longevity expectation? If you have a longer than normal life expectancy in your family, that’s especially the time to look at those things, because that’s [inaudible: 05:39].

Dick: You can really come out ahead. Our goal is never to do out and beat up on the insurance company, but when it comes down to . . . Eric says, “Yes we do.” When it comes down to the client or the insurance company, we’re for the client.

Eric: That’s exactly right. We want you to make the most money possible back.

Dick: If you can win against the insurance company, then obviously, longevity is one of those variables, those wildcards.

Eric: Our goal is for everybody to win. I say that facetiously. I don’t want to take the insurance company down, but that being said, I want all my clients to benefit.

Dick: To benefit in the best way possible. We really come down to, Eric, a low-rate interest environment. It’s affecting retirees all over the country, and their choices aren’t that many.

Eric: No, very limited. I don’t want to say ‘in closing,’ necessarily, but in summary . . .

Dick: It’s okay. We can close.

Eric: Look at your full range of options because of the interest rate environment. It’s not the time to be sitting on the fence, unfortunately. People keep on saying, “If I wait.’ I’ve had somebody out there waiting for 3 years now, waiting for rates to increase, and the opposite has happened.

Dick: It lost ground, and they don’t have the same options they had a few years ago.

Eric: How long can you sit in a 0.5% CD?

Dick: With 3% inflation.

Eric: Exactly. You’re losing money by putting yourself in a . . .

Dick: You’re going backwards at 2½% to 4% a year, probably.

Eric: In summary, yes. Low interest rates hurt retirees, they’re very painful, but it shouldn’t stop you from taking action and making a progressive retirement plan.

Dick: Yeah, making a good decision. Use a good financial advisor and just weigh all the options. Thank you.