Please don’t think that we are anti-pension. We love pensions and the **guarantees they offer; however, lately we have been talking with people who were counting on pension benefits to be there when they [continued below video…]

 Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

[continued]…retired – yet are now fearful that due to “unfunded pension liabilities”, they may not receive the benefits they worked so long to achieve and now feel forced to take an unfair lump sum buyout.

Pensions are **guaranteed nationally by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PGBC) and they help advise employees impacted by lost or failing plans. It should be noted that most pensioners receive their full benefits even when they are administered by the PGBC. So, why the concern? The PGBC is currently running over a 60 billion dollar deficit due to the number of recent bankruptcies. Congress is expected to try and close the gap by increasing the premiums due to the PGBC, which are charged on a per participant basis; however, many suspect that increases in those premiums will just continue to increase the number of companies dropping pension plans and programs altogether.

So, what happens when a solvent company wants to drop their pension program? The company typically has two options; they can offload the liabilities of the pensions to an insurance carrier to fulfill the obligation or they can offer a lump sum payment that covers pensioner’s benefit.

Just because you are offered a buyout does not mean you should jump at the option solely because of the risk of the entire system. Most pension benefits are “richer” than what is typically available from an insurance company issuing a new annuity in the commercial market. Thus, when you are offered a buyout, you have to examine the whole package and ask yourself a number of questions, such as;

• What are the benefits offered versus what is available commercially?
• What is the financial status of my company’s pension fund and why are they offering a buyout?
• Do I need additional benefits for my family or spouse not covered under my existing plan?
• What happens if the PBGC takes over my benefit?
• When do I need the money?
• Would I rather have more flexibility and manage my own money with securities, or annuities, or both?
• Do I want a benefit/lump sum that could be passed onto my heirs? (Especially if you have a short life expectancy due to health)

If you determine that accepting a buyout is the best move, you still have the option of purchasing a level or increasing  now or in the future from an insurance company. We believe that highly rated insurance companies offer a higher degree of safety and stability than most financial instruments offer due to the high level of assets and reserves they are required to maintain. Also, with annuities, you have a number of options available that allow for income **guarantees combined with the flexibility of still maintaining full control over the majority of your dollars at all times.

In summary, if you are offered a buyout, take the time to carefully consider your options so that you can make the best decision possible. It would be wise to consult an advisor with experience and expertise who can help you carefully balance all the possible pluses and minuses prior to taking a lump sum buyout.

Here is an exerpt from Kiplinger’s that is a great read for anyone interested in more info on this topic.

Put Your Pension to Work

By Sandra Block, From Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, January 2016

How you decide to take this endangered asset may be crucial to a secure retirement.

Fretting about how to manage your pension is like complaining about the cost of winterizing your beach house. Lots of people would love to have your problem.

Only about 18% of private-industry workers have a defined-benefit pension. Less than one-fourth of Fortune 500 companies offered a defined-benefit plan to new employees at the end of 2013, down from 60% in 1998, according to Towers Watson, the human resources consulting firm. The number is much larger for public-sector workers; about 80% of them have a traditional pension.

If you’re eligible for a traditional pension, you’ll be faced with important decisions that could affect your financial security, and they’re usually irrevocable. That means when you retire, you’ll need to do more than turn in your security badge and wait for the monthly checks to roll in.

Backing away from defined benefits

The move away from traditional pensions reflects several trends. Employees are living longer, which increases the cost of providing a lifetime monthly payment. Low interest rates have reduced pension funds’ investment returns, requiring com­panies to put more money into their plans to avoid a shortfall. Government regulations designed to protect pension participants have increased the cost of offering and maintaining defined-benefit plans. Finally, companies used to view pensions as a way to attract and retain good employees. But these days, a benefit that rewards longevity is a lot less valuable because workers change jobs every 4.6 years, on average, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Even if you’re among the minority of private-sector workers covered by a pension, you’re not immune from efforts to reduce pension costs. AT&T, Boeing and IBM have joined other companies with big pension obligations in switching to a cash-balance plan. These hybrid plans combine features of a 401(k) and a traditional pension. Benefits from a traditional pension are typically based on a participant’s salary during the final years of employment, but with a cash-balance plan, benefits are accrued evenly over time. When a company converts, participants are usually entitled to the benefits they’ve earned to date under the traditional formula, with future benefits based on the cash-balance calculation. For longtime employees, the shift can result in a big cut in benefits.

Other companies have frozen pension benefits. The number of plans with frozen benefits rose from 10% in 2003 to 32% in 2011, according to Russell Research, a financial research firm based in East Rutherford, N.J. Many companies have cushioned a pension freeze by providing higher contributions to workers’ 401(k) plans. That could pay off for young workers who haven’t accrued much in the way of pension benefits, but a freeze can be costly for mid-career workers. Their future raises and years of service won’t be factored into their pension, and they’ll have less time to make up the difference by contributing to a 401(k), even if it comes with a generous employer match.

In the past, pension participants could count on the payouts they were promised once they started receiving benefits, but that’s changing, too. A new law allows multi-employer pension plans to cut benefits for current and retired workers. These plans typically provide coverage for union members who work for different companies, usually in the construction, manufacturing and trucking industries. Because of a decline in employment in those sectors, the plans have come under severe financial stress. In October, the Central States Pension Fund, a multi-employer plan that covers more than 400,000 participants, proposed cutting its benefits by an average of 22%. Some retirees will see their benefits cut by up to 60%.

A nice problem to have

Carin Hoch, 58, vice president of real estate for NuStar Energy in San Antonio, vividly recalls a meeting she and her husband, Ron, had about five years ago with their financial adviser to discuss financing a retirement home. After reviewing their salaries, retirement savings and other assets, the adviser turned to Ron and said, “She’s a keeper.” The reason: Hoch will retire with a traditional pension.

Hoch hasn’t decided whether she’ll take her pension as lifetime payouts or a lump sum when she retires. The Hochs have other sources of retirement income, including 401(k) plans, but having a pension in the mix has given them options they wouldn’t otherwise have. It has made it possible for Ron to retire at age 59 so that he can help care for Carin’s father, who is 93. It will allow Carin to retire in four to six years. It even helped them get a lower interest rate on the mortgage for their retirement home because it showed “financial stability.”

The couple plan to use the income from Carin’s pension and Social Security to pay for their living expenses. They’ll spend money from their 401(k) plans on travel and other discretionary items. Considering what can happen in the stock market, Carin says, having a pension “really gives us a comfort zone.”

Not only that, but retirees like the Hochs can invest money in their retirement accounts and other savings more aggressively, which offers the potential for higher returns. A monthly annuity payment “is like a bond portfolio,” says Charles Sachs, a certified financial planner in Miami. “You can buy riskier assets because you have this cushion of dollars coming in.”

Lump sum versus lifetime payout. If, like Hoch, you’re covered by a pension, this decision may be the most important one you’ll face when you retire. As employers look for ways to rid themselves of costly pension liabilities, they’re increasingly offering to pay departing employees a lump sum in lieu of a lifetime annuity payout. Figuring out which option is right for you will depend on a number of factors, ranging from the size of the lump sum to how long you expect to live.

See more information and details at Kiplingers.com

The post A Lump Sum Buyout or Keep Your Pension – Which is Best? appeared first on Annuity Guys®.

Well, we want you to know that this rule does not apply to annuities. As Annuity Guys®, we may be a tad-bit more sensitive to reading the negativity spewed by some writers when it comes to annuities; however, it does appear that any increase in complaints by investors or consumers just comes down to one particular type of annuity – the variable annuity^#.

Watch as Dick and Eric discuss complaints on annuities and other financial products.

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

Overall, annuity complaints actually decreased in 2013, but for the popular media it appears to be a lot more fun to talk about the high commissions, high fees, and bad advisors that offer theses products. You really have to dig to find an article that compares the number of complaints from mutual fund^{^}s and stock transactions — which far outpace those from annuity sales.

As Annuity Guys®, we are on record as stating that an annuity is not where you should put all your money, but it can be a great location to place dollars that will used to fund retirement income. Annuities are a financial tool and when used properly can alleviate risk to your portfolio.

You would never guess this article cites the fact that nine out of ten annuity owners are at least somewhat satisfied…

 Angry Annuity Clients Seek Damages

By Matthew Heimer

When stock markets are humming along nicely, customers are less likely to complain about their brokers and financial advisers: 2013 was on pace to be the fourth year in a row of sharp declines in the number of arbitration cases filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra), the brokerage industry’s self-regulatory body. But as Matthias Rieker reports this week in The Wall Street Journal, complaints about one kind of investment remain stubbornly high. The outlier: Variable annuities.

Variable annuities usually offer a retirement saver a **guaranteed future payout, along with a chance of increasing the value of the saver’s initial investment depending on how markets perform; investments in many of these annuities can be tax-deferred. But they’ve long exasperated consumer advocates because of their relatively high commissions and fees, along with their often-impenetrable rules about what, exactly, an investor’s account is worth at any given time.

As Rieker reports, “In 2012, the variable annuity^# was the only class of security for which arbitration claims increased”; last year, the total number of annuity complaints dropped about 20%, but complaints in other asset categories dropped far faster. […Read More at MarketWatch]

Video Transcription:

Dick: And I’m Dick.
Eric: Hello, I’m Eric and we’re the annuity guys.
Dick: Well, Eric, are annuity complaints on the rise.
Eric: No… Yes.. No… Ours? no!
Dick: Depends on which annuity complaints you want to talk about.                                                                       Eric: And that’s exactly the case. And then we see the black eye of the industry coming out in the open ever again with the old variable annuity^#.
Dick: Well, and that’s something that has been on the rise are variable annuity^# complaints and it runs the gammon from the fees and the surrender charges and loosing money when stocks go the wrong way.
Eric: You can loose money.
Dick: But what’s very interesting is the fixed annuities which would take in that hybrid annuity and everything. We’ve seen those complaints go down steadily. They kinda of hit the peak somewhere around 2006 – 2007; roughly around 200 complaints. And folks, when you think about this, 200 complaints over ten of thousands of folks that buy annuities in a given year; that’s not a lot of complaints. But now, they’ve actually  tapered down. Fixed indexed annuities sales have been way up and their complaints have tapered down to – last year – i think around 54 complaints for the entire year.
Eric: Even when we look at the variable annuity^# complaints – one hundred sixty-five complaints on variable annuity^#.
Dick: That is not a huge number.
Eric: And we should very clearly clarify here that when somebody complains about annuity, it’s typically not because of the annuity design, it’s  not the insurance company; unfortunately, it’s guys like us.                       Dick: Annuity guys.
Eric: Annuity guys or people that want to be annuity guys…
Dick: I beg your pardon.
Eric: -Who don’t fully understand the product. They don’t explain it very well, so they have consumers confused and they don’t know which direction they’re going; and their inability to articulate what product….
Dick: And Eric, this does not show up later when the person has the policy ans they have some need. They need to get additional money or they need to turn their income on or whatever; and it does not work the way they were told that was supposed to work.
Eric: They get caught with the sizzle side perhaps; the 5 percent **guaranteed roll up for income and deferral.
Dick: Or they though they’re going to earn 5 percent every year, **guaranteed. They see their account dropped a couple of years in a raw and they’re like “hey, this is not what I bought?”
Eric: That’s right! “That’s not what you’re told me”… and that’s where the complaints come from. And I guess, really to be fair to the annuity industry, we should say the number of complaints in comparison to the mutual fund^{^}s…
Dick: Or the securities industry… and that literally, looking at the reports that we’ve been looking at I think the SEC last year had over ten thousand total complaints. Now, that’s a lot of complaints. And we tend to not see that. What’s interesting about this is that we don’t see that in this financial articles a lot; we don’t a lot who talked about that.
Eric: I think we don’t want to talk about the thing we don’t want to know.
Dick: But we see a lot of talk about “ohh, this annuity this, this annuity that.” And I’ve seen now that the populous has become a little more educated about annuities; a little more understanding us out there; I’m seeing less of these negative articles showing up.
Eric: Well, I wish I could say I see less of that. Maybe I’m drawn to… it’s like everybody has a newspaper article or blog like to pick on it. The topic of this one, “Angry annuity client seek damages.” Now, that does not say “you know, really…” If you look at proportion, it’s not nearly as bad as the people with stocks that are three, four or five times as many complaints. It’s people…. the highlights….
Dick: It crabs attention and it sells advertising; and this is part of the industry. And folks, really, when you get down to why annuities are so popular and why they have so few complaints? It is because they actually do the opposite of what the market does; they make your money safe.
Eric: Right. Safety first.
Dick: It’s right.
Eric: And that’s why i always qrench when I see people that have newspaper articles – I’m not going to mention their names because they don’t deserve the heck. They’re like ohh, I like the brokers advice until they recommended an index annuity.
Dick: You would not be thinking about Malcolm Berko.
Eric: Yes, I would. I’m thinking of him too. It gives us bad names because we are in the index annuity world; we understand how they work, we understand where the benefits are and unfortunately, people that don’t live in our world…
Dick: And if you’re just, as Bill O’Reilly says “fair and balance”, there are ways that annuities can be used wrong, ways that are used correctly; they’re just simply a financial tool.
Eric: That’s exactly right. Annuities are great way to make sure you don’t live too long. It’s longevity, it’s guarding against outliving your money and we talked about that being the strength in the cornerstone.
Dick: The principle of protection; protecting what you’ve put into an annuity in terms of premium and you know that you’ll never go backwards – we’re talking about fixed annuity – and obviously, the variable is.
Eric: And we have some issues of the variable annuities^# ourselves because we don’t like to loose money and we don’t like for our clients to loose money.
Dick: Yes, we don’t like for our clients to loose money. So, are they on the rise or it depends on rather you’re talking about which type of annuity?
Eric: It depends if you’re in our office because in our office, not so much.
Dick: The complaints are under control.
Eric: That’s right.
Dick: Thank you.

The post Are Annuity Complaints on the Rise? appeared first on Annuity Guys®.

Well, that might not be exactly how it goes, but you definitely cannot put pensions on the **guaranteed list anymore.

In Illinois we have just passed pension reform in the legislature. Pension reform sounds nice, but what it translates into for retired state employees is not so nice; and for those retirees, it means losing promised relied upon income and benefits.

However, that may end up being minor compared to the impact of the bankruptcy Detroit is facing. This may lead to an avalanche of bankruptcies as cities and municipalities try to find a means to deal with their bloated deficits based on under-funded pension liabilities.

Watch as Dick and Eric discuss why many retirees are scrambling to save their ASSets! lol (Pun intended)

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

What does this mean for pensioners in these systems? We’re wagering it will mean at the very least reduced substantially benefits and incomes – driving many towards increased participation in annuities.

Why more annuity participation?

In an era of deficits and reducing benefits, people want safety and **guarantees – contractual **guarantees that will stand up in a court of law not easily broken legislative promises.  Annuities can provide a degree of income certainty as the public sector debates the benefits of programs like Social Security and Medicare.

Annuities offered by solid companies can help all of us weather these turbulent economic times to create a stable foundational income – for life. Will an annuity be required for the successful retirement of the future? Who knows? We do know, however, that studies continue to show that annuity owners have a greater probability of having enough income throughout retirement than those who do not.

You must decide if an annuity will help empower your retirement.

Detroit eligible for nation’s largest municipal bankruptcy filing, federal judge rules

By Michael A. Fletcher and Reid Wilson at WashingtonPost.com

A federal bankruptcy judge granted Detroit unprecedented powers Tuesday to shed billions of dollars in debt, including the ability to slash city employee pensions despite a state constitutional provision protecting them.

In approving the nation’s ­largest-ever municipal filing, Judge Steven Rhodes cleared the way for Detroit’s emergency manager to develop a plan to reorganize the city’s estimated $18 billion in debt. Beyond cutting worker pensions and retiree health benefits, the city could stiff bondholders and sell city assets such as its water and sewer authority and its priceless art collection.

Municipal bankruptcy experts called particular attention to Rhodes’s decision to allow pensions to be put on the chopping block. Some said the move would set a precedent for future municipal bankruptcies. And unions vowed to appeal the decision.

“This is the first opinion of its kind where a bankruptcy court has directly expressed the view that the supremacy of U.S. bankruptcy laws trumps state constitutional protections of public pension holders,” (emphasis added) said Mark S. Kaufman, senior partner at McKenna, Long & Aldridge, an Atlanta law firm. “The implications of that decision are significant not only to Detroit but also potentially to other cities gauging their level of fiscal distress and how to deal with it.” [Read More…]

Video Transcription:

Eric: Hi, I’m Eric.
Dick: And I’m Dick. We’re the annuity guys.
Eric: You think we’re going get in trouble with the topic today, Dick.
Dick: Well, there’s a little pun intended there. We’re talking about saving your ass-ets… or your proverbial rear end.
Eric: And the reason that the topic came up is because it’s kind of forefront in the news right now.
Dick: It is.
Eric: … looking at what’s going on around…
Dick: Well, Detroit what’s got us going, the ruling.
Eric: Detroit and Illinois because…
Dick: Well, we’re falling apart in Illinois.
Eric: We’re close to home here… the pension reform meaning we’re going to take some..
Dick: We’re going to take some of what we promised you back. And that ruling in Detroit by the judge just recently said in essence “folks, your out a lot.”
Eric: Your pension benefits may not be what was **guaranteed. Now, they said what I think they technically said is “the amount we promised you is not **guaranteed.
Dick: So, imagine that. I mean what does that throw into question Eric?
Eric: Well, and that’s… for me it throws into question that I was promised as a retiree. If I’m **guaranteed or I think I’m
**guaranteed of a lifetime pension from the company I work or the municipality that i work for, what does that mean about what’s on the table right now as far as **guarantees from that side of it?
Dick: Exactly.
Eric: And as a planner, it’s also got me feeling a little bit disconcern because we work with people. A lot of times we start with – what are you receiving from Social Security? What are you receiving from pension? And if all these things that we think are **guarantees that we’re basing the future income on, are all of a sudden on the table as far as reductions without any consultation of the person getting reduced, then there’s a lot of this concerns going on.
Dick: So many times folks you come to Eric and I through the website or when we work with the local client, it’s kind of a plan A – how can we establish that income, set it up for that income shortfall, or that need in retirement. But more and more, it’s becoming about the plan B – and that is we can’t rely on our pensions, we can’t rely on our social security. Many times – even the private pensions – they’re offering the lumpsums, the buy outs…
Eric: GM , Ford…  we’ve had a lot of conversations with folks in those areas that have said “hey, I’ve got a choice of taking this or this.” Well, for those guys, I’m a lot more comfortable now because Ford and MGM got out of the pension business. They decided “let’s give it to a professional that can manage it” and Detroit says “do you want to take the dollars yourself and manage them, maybe with the assistance of an annuity or let a real annuity manage it?” So, I feel better for those folks now
than I did when Ford and GM are managing their own pensions.
Dick: When we look at the traditional 401K and IRA, and what people are left with and their own savings to plan their future, their retirement; the actual, according to the Dal Bar studies and different studies out there, the average investor doesn’t pay so well. So to really literally rely on the markets to carry you through retirement, most folks are coming or have come to the conclusion that “I can’t do that.” So what they’re doing is they are looking at that fallback position “what can get me through my retirement years?” And amazingly, annuities, which had been there for hundreds of years proven track record come back to the forefront.. it’s like “hey, this is what I’m looking at, this is what I believe is what I need.”
Eric: Well, and I know studies out there that show for the highest degree of success or the likelihood of success and having enough income in retirement, having an annuity as a piece of that retirement increases that level of success…
Dick: Dramatically. I mean you go from like a seventy-three or seventy-five percent success rate with the stocks and bonds I think was an ibids to study we were looking at a while back to a ninety-nine percent success rate; and that means a lot to folks. I mean, the thought of being one out five or one out of four that fails; when you’ve saved these assets all your life and you have to have them to carry you through.
Eric: We talk about protecting the foundational aspects of income with pension, Social Security, and annuity; well, it may be reversed now that we start talking about what kind of an annuity do you need to have to protect your income in the future, then we’ll add on that pension and social security, and hope that that cost of living still stays in place.
Dick: Well… and that does become that plan B. And for many folks that have got plan A in place that will work well if everything holds together, it’s what do I do for my plan B – because I don’t know. And we have actually sat down with clients and they’ve like look… “I don t even want to consider social security. I don’t want to consider this. I wanna look at what I can do for myself. And that I’m going to look at as the gravy.” Now, we take a more middle-of-the-road view than that but that plan B is becoming more and more important. And so folks, you might be thinking some of those same thoughts and you’re not alone because it is a real concern.
Eric: Yes. Alright. We’ll Dick, in summary here, if we’re saying yes annuities can saveour assets…
Dick: Yes.
Eric: What would we say are the kind of primary reasons why we would rely on annuities?
Dick: Well, first of all Eric, its safety. They’re very, very safe. You can rely on an annuity for future income; lifetime future income. You  don’t know how long you’ll going to live. you don’t want your money to run out. So, for that foundational portion, you can rely on it for the income; and the aspect of safely growing assets and protecting them along the way with the plan B in place to protect. I believe that annuities really do give us that position to protect us and literally save our rears.
Eric: Saving those assets: safety, **guarantees, lifetime income.                                                                                                           Dick: Thank you.

The post Can Annuities Save Your Assets? appeared first on Annuity Guys®.

In Illinois, we are aware of how much strife a public pension battle can impact both the fiscal health of the state and that of those employees who were promised lifetime retirement benefits. The proposed legislation would provide for private insurance carriers to manage the public sector retirement income pension systems. Historically, many individuals enjoyed the benefits of defined benefit plans. Yet, now with benefits being cut and lump sum buyouts being offered, many employees are weighting the option of defined benefits versus a pension styled annuity plan.

The Annuity Guys® discuss why insurance companies – with proven track records in managing investment and longevity risk successfully – may be better choices for overseeing your retirement income than both private and public sector pension managers.

**Guarantees, including optional benefits, are backed by the claims-paying ability of the issuer, and may contain limitations, including surrender charges, which may affect policy values. During this segment, Dick and Eric are referring to Fixed Annuities unless otherwise specified.

If you (and your spouse, if you have one) could have a pension styled income for life and still pass on any unspent retirement dollars to heirs, would you do it? This is the reason many individuals are converting lump sum buyouts, 401ks and IRAs into annuity portfolios that provide lifetime income, safe and consistent growth with preservation of their lump sum principal from their retirement savings.

Here’s the news from MSN that generated the inspiration for this weeks blog.

Senator Hatch says insurance firms can ease U.S. pension crisis

By Lisa Lambert

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A top Republican senator unveiled legislation on Tuesday that would radically change public pensions by having life insurance companies pay benefits through annuity contracts, helping to alleviate the underfunding that has engulfed many plans.

The bill introduced by Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, the highest-ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, would have the government pay a premium each year to a state-licensed insurer in an amount equal to a set percentage of salary. Employees would then receive fixed income annuity contracts from the insurance company.

“A new public pension design is needed, one that provides cost certainty for state and local taxpayers, retirement income security for state and local employees and one that does not include an explicit or implicit government **guarantee,” Hatch said in a speech to the Senate.

Annuities function similarly to pension plans by paying set amounts in regular installments. The accumulation of annuity contracts would even out interest-rate fluctuations, according to Hatch, who would have insurers competitively bid for them.

Underfunding is “not possible,” he added.

The bill would not cover past pension liabilities, but allow state and local governments “to stop digging the hole with their existing defined benefit plans,” said Julia Lawless, a spokeswoman for Hatch. [… Read more at MSN]

The post Relying on Annuities for Retirement Pensions appeared first on Annuity Guys®.